Home Help Site Map Search Contact Us
South Carolina Education Directory
South Carolina Education DirectorySouth Carolina Schools and Colleges
The Most Complete Directory of South Carolina K-12 School and College Information on the Internet
South Carolina Picture of the Week
South Carolina Education Directory

South Carolina SC Hotels ... Online Reservations + Immediate Confirmations

Why Can'T My Students Do It My Way?

Thomas C. Thompson
The Citadel

Diversity. The word describes the disparate ways my wife and I approach problem solving tasks. When faced with a problem, I generally begin by talking about it. I talk just long enough to clarify the problem, then I start spinning out possible solutions, leaving the details for later. Of course, my approach may produce some unworkable solutions or cause me to get some of my facts wrong, but at least I'm doing something. For me, "doing something" (even if it's wrong) is the vital first step to getting anywhere. As I see it, mine is a logical, effective method of problem solving.

From my wife's perspective, though, my approach is more reckless than worthwhile. A detail-oriented person, she's more interested in accuracy than in speed. She likes to find out all the details, then consider them systematically. While I'm rushing to get lots of ideas on the table so I can start sorting through them, she's methodically collecting all the details so she can see how they might fit together. Furthermore, she's usually doing it quietly. She works best when she can sit quietly with her energy turned inward, and she comes up with some good solutions when I leave her alone long enough to let her think.

So what do these two descriptions have to do with diversity in the English classroom? They describe two possible approaches that students might take to problem solving--approaches that might seem as reckless (and frustrating) to teachers as my actions can seem to my wife (or vice versa). Understanding these and other approaches can both reduce teachers' frustration levels in class and help them plan assignments that will give a greater variety of students the opportunity to draw on their strengths.

Type Theory and Personality Preferences

One way to explain such differences is through personality type theory. This theory holds that, just as we can identify people as "right-handed" or "left-handed" because they tend to use one hand more often (and with greater skill) than the other, we can also identify other consistent patterns in the way people act. Those patterns, or "preferences," are evident in the ways we focus our attention, take in information, make decisions, and manage our environments. As Isabel Myers explains in Gifts Differing (which itself is an extension of the work of Swiss psychologist Carl Jung) some people focus their attention and energy consistently on their environment, while others tend to turn their attention inward. When taking in new information, some people attend to facts and details, while others attend more to ideas and relationships. In the language of personality type, these four preferences are called Extroversion, Introversion, Sensing Perception, and Intuitive Perception. In the examples with which I began, my approach to problem solving reflects my preferences for Extroversion and Intuitive Perception, whereas my wife's approach reflects her preferences for Introversion and Sensing Perception. ("Preferences" are important here. Just as right-handed people are able to write left handed, Extroverts are able to use introversion, but they typically prefer extroversion and are therefore generally more comfortable and more proficient when using it.) Specifically, I tend to approach problem solving by turning my energy outward--by talking about my ideas, discussing the problem, and getting lots of ideas out on the table--while my wife prefers to turn inward so she can consider alternatives without external distractions. Further, I attend to the "big picture"--concepts, relationships, ideas--while my wife attends to the numerous details that make up the big picture. Although we may both arrive at satisfactory solutions, our paths are quite different.

As long as we can each work in the ways that we prefer, there's no problem. When I am forced to work quietly, however (as, for example, a student might have to do when confronted with a complex essay question), or when my wife is given too few details (as when a student is given only the broad outlines of a research question), difficulties arise. Sometimes, problems are unavoidable: to allow students to discuss an essay question during the exam period, for instance, could defeat the purpose of the exam. At other times, though, teachers can take steps to help students draw on their strengths while also challenging them to improve their less developed skills.

Practical Differences Associated with the Eight Preferences

The chart below shows the eight preferences identified by personality type theory: Extroversion and Introversion, Sensing Perception and Intuitive Perception, Thinking Judgment and Feeling Judgment, and a Judging Attitude and a Perceiving Attitude. Teachers need not master the intricacies of type theory to use it in the classroom; simply recognizing and acknowledging the existence of differences can improve instruction.


  • EXTROVERSION - directs
    energy and attention
    outward, toward people and
    objects.
  • SENSING PERCEPTION -
    attends to measurable
    observable facts.
  • THINKING JUDGMENT -
    analyzes facts impersonally
    and objectively.
  • JUDGING ATTITUDE -
    controls and regulates
    events in a planned, orderly
    way.

  • INTROVERSION - directs
    energy and attention inward,
    toward ideas.
  • INTUITIVE PERCEPTION -
    attends to relationships and
    possibilities.
  • FEELING JUDGMENT - weighs
    facts and values personally
    and subjectively.
  • PERCEIVING ATTITUDE -
    adapts readily to change and
    welcomes spontaneity.

Teachers' preferences on each of these four scales can be reflected in classroom management, in teaching styles, and even in the ways they evaluate student learning. With respect to classroom management, for example, teachers who prefer Extroversion are more likely to be comfortable with higher levels of activity in the classroom, whereas those who prefer Introversion are more likely to prefer a quiet environment (in which students can "hear themselves think"). Teachers who prefer a Judging Attitude generally like more structure than those who prefer a Perceiving Attitude. Someone who prefers Sensing, Thinking, and Judging is probably comfortable with the order, logic, and structure of a row-and-column arrangement of desks; someone who prefers Intuition, Feeling, and Perceiving may be stifled by a row-and-column arrangement, preferring instead to try a variety of arrangements, perhaps even trying different arrangements for different classes or different assignments. No particular method of classroom management in inherently "good" or "bad," of course, but an Extroverted student might have a hard time generating or evaluating ideas in an Introverted teacher's quiet classroom, and an Introverted student might have difficulty coming up with quick responses to an Extroverted teacher's discussion questions.

Personality preferences can also be reflected in teaching styles. In People Types and Tiger Stripes, Gordon Lawrence describes several such differences (79-80):

Despite these patterns, type theory is not deterministic; it does not suggest that all Judging types will have the same teaching style, or even that all teachers who prefer Extroversion, Sensing, Thinking, and Judging will have the same style. Then again, not all right-handed people hold a pencil the same way or have the same handwriting. In general, however, right-handed people do tend to slant their letters to the right, whereas left-handed people tend to slant their letters to the left. Similarly, Judging types tend to use teaching methods that lend themselves to closure, whereas Perceiving types tend to use methods that lend themselves to open-endedness. Further, just as a right-handed person may find it difficult to write left-handed, a Sensing student may find it difficult to understand an assignment, probably given by an Intuitive teacher, that requires extensive use of Intuitive skills.

When Preferences Clash

Suppose that Sensing teacher, who leans to attending to details and putting them together sequentially to form a concept, tries to teach an Intuitive student, to whom details are of little use without first having a concept with which to make sense of them. The teacher is likely to teach from the specific to the general, but the student may learn best by moving from the general to the specific: their preferred ways of teaching and learning simply clash.

To offer a concrete example, Gordon Lawrence tells of a student at a diesel mechanics school who was given a diagram of an alternator, then given a defective alternator and asked to take it apart, fix it, and reassemble it, using the diagram as his guide. Frustrated with the diagram, the student simply took the alternator apart, carefully laid the pieces in a pattern, saw the problem, fixed it, then reversed his steps to put the working alternator back together again. Only after this process did the diagram make sense (41). In this example, the student was a Sensing type who had difficulty following instructions that called for Intuitive skills.

Difficulties go beyond merely giving assignments or designing test items that don't make sense to some students, though. Students with type preferences opposite from the teacher's are not only more likely to have difficulty adjusting to that teacher's teaching style and methods of evaluation, but are also more likely to produce work that fails to meet that teacher's expectations--and, ultimately, to receive lower grades. Stanislaus Sobczyk found just such results in a study of 35 teachers and 217 eleventh grade students: the Intuitive teachers gave significantly higher end-of-semester grades to Intuitive students than to Sensing students, and Judging teachers gave significantly higher grades to Judging students than to Perceiving students. In a similar study, Georgia Lamphere found that teachers not only gave higher academic ratings to students with similar type preferences, but also rated them higher on social behavior and interpersonal relationships.

These results should not be particularly surprising. When people have the same type preferences, they also "tend to have in common whatever qualities result from the exercise of those preferences" (Myers and McCaulley 19, their emphasis). That is, they tend to have similar ways of viewing the world and making sense of it. In effect, they speak the same language, so they understand each other. People with opposite type preferences don't speak quite the same language, so they don't understand each other as well. In the case of a student and teacher with opposite preferences, the student is not likely to understand or produce what the teacher wants, and the teacher is not likely to understand or appreciate what the student produces. Lower grades and higher levels of frustration naturally follow.

Allowing for Diversity in the Classroom

Trying to teach all students in ways that appeal to their personality preferences, even if it were possible, would not be the way to improve communication in the classroom. In fact, such a strategy would probably create more problems than it solved, since teachers would have to use methods they found awkward or inadequate. Besides, if students were taught only in ways consistent with their own preferences--and were therefore never required to develop skills associated with the opposite preferences--they would have little opportunity to grow. Having a variety of teachers over the years virtually insures that students will encounter at least some teachers with preferences similar to their own and some teachers with preferences different from their own. Within any given class, however, the teacher can develop teaching practices that will both allow students to utilize skills associated with their own preferences and challenge them to develop skills associated with the opposite preferences.

One of the simplest ways to increase the chances that students will be able to utilize their strengths is to provide options. When designing exams, many teachers automatically include several kinds of test items: matching, true/false, and fill in the blank items most often test knowledge of facts, whereas short answer and essay questions generally require a synthesis of those facts. Even for a single kind of test item, however, there is room for variety: Some items could require retrieval of factual information, others could require synthesis of facts, others could require analysis, and still others could focus on personal implications of actions or policies. Given this kind of variety, some items are sure to draw on each student's strengths, while others will challenge less developed skills. Although not every assignment can have options that appeal to every preference, a series of assignments (over the course of a semester) can easily provide enough variety to draw on the skills associated with the different preferences. A teacher who generally assigns individual projects, for example, could occasionally have students work in pairs or small groups. One who usually lectures or conducts teacher-centered discussions (that is, discussions in which student comments are directed to the teacher) could occasionally step back and let a student be in charge of leading a discussion. Someone who typically conducts fast-paced discussions could write the topic on the board before class (or even announce it a class period in advance) to give students extra time to consider their ideas before being called on to talk about them. A teacher whose assignments generally focus on collecting and analyzing factual information could create an occasional assignment in which students take facts from one situation and apply them to a different one, or perhaps one which shifts the focus from the facts themselves to the implications of those facts for a particular group of people. The key is simply to provide variety--an occasional change from the usual way of doing things.

Another simple strategy is to let a friend or colleague read your assignments to see whether they make sense. Because I know that I tend to write "for" other Intuitives, I usually ask my wife (a Sensing type) to read my exams and point out any test items or instructions that are not clear to her. I also like to discuss class activities with her because I know I tend to plan Extroverted activities, and she can tell me how she (as an Introvert) would respond. Being an Extrovert probably makes it easier for me to talk with colleagues about my classes, but I find that sharing syllabi and exams and discussing assignments helps improve my teaching, both by reminding me of the variety of ways to approach a given lesson and by letting me know what "works" for students in other classes.

Personality Preferences in the English Classroom

Personality type theory can help explain many curious phenomena that occur in English classrooms. For example, when asked to select an essay representing their "best" work, some students will choose one that is technically sound and grammatically correct (even though it may not be particularly lively or engaging), while others will choose an essay they enjoyed writing or that focuses on a topic they care about (even though it may have more errors than other essays). Those who use objective criteria are likely to be using their Thinking judgment, which is based on objective analysis; those who use more personal criteria are probably using their Feeling judgment, which emphasizes values over objectivity. Introverts, who tend to work ideas out in their heads before committing them to paper, may be reluctant to revise their papers--not because they object to drafting, but because they have been through numerous (mental) drafts already. Extroverts, who tend to act first and think later, may write first drafts that ramble excessively--not because they can't think clearly, but because they work out their thinking on paper (or by talking). Students who can't seem to put anything on paper until the night before it is due may be Perceiving types who want to keep all their options open as long as possible. Judging types, on the other hand, are usually on time with their assignments, but in order to finish their work on schedule, they may cut off inquiry before they have gathered adequate information for the task at hand. Because they work best when attending to rules and following step-by-step instructions, Sensing types may seem overly focused on the details of an assignment ("How many words? Does it have to follow a certain format? How many sources have to be cited?") rather than on the larger goals. Intuitive types, who prefer the challenge of creating something new and different, may seem to try to avoid conforming to any rules set up for assignments.

Conclusion

A general understanding of type concepts is enough to help explain student behaviors and reduce teacher frustration. (For a thorough discussion of the connections between type preferences and writing processes, however, I recommend George Jensen and John DiTiberio's Personality and the Teaching of Composition.) For me, recognizing that not all students talk to sort out their thoughts (as I do) can help reduce my frustration with "shy, reserved" students who are actually just trying to do their work in the way that works best for them. Realizing that questions about length and format of an essay may be necessary for Sensing students (because they are uncomfortable starting a task until they know the precise guidelines within which they must work) lets me see that their questions are not necessarily as trivial as I might otherwise think. Knowing that Thinking students value objectivity over personal reactions helps me understand why some students focus so much on presenting material "in a clear, organized fashion" that they lose sight of their audience. Understanding that Perceiving students may be waiting until they gather all the information possible may help me see their actions as on-task rather than lazy. In short, when I can recognize differences in learning styles (and how some students' learning styles may be at odds with my natural teaching style), and can accept those differences as legitimate rather than disruptive or stubborn, my classroom becomes more pleasant and less stressful for both me and my students.

Works Cited

Jensen, George H. and John K. DiTiberio. Personality and the Teaching of Composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1989.

Lamphere, Georgina Ines. "The Relationship Between Teacher and Student Personality and Its Effects on Teacher Perception of Student." DAI 46 (1985): 1564A. United States International University.

Lawrence, Gordon. People Types and Tiger Stripes: A Practical Guide to Learning Styles, 2nd ed. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 1983.

Murphy, Elizabeth. The Developing Child: Using Jungian Type to Understand Children. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992.

Myers, Isabel, and Mary McCaulley. Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the MBTI. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1985.

Myers, Isabel Briggs, with Peter B. Myers. Gifts Differing, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1980.

Sobczyk, J. M. Stanislaus. "The Relationship Between Teacher-Student Personality Type Alignment and Teacher-Assigned End-of-Semester Grades." DAI 47 (1986): 2533A. University of San Francisco.